Go

Go Back   PetFinder.my > Reviews, Notices & Stories > Hall of Shame

Hall of Shame There are lots of cruel and inconsiderate people out there. Expose their cruel deeds to the world and let them be shamed!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 02-02-2009, 10:03 PM
Sashy's Avatar
Sashy Sashy is offline
PetFinder Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 16
Sashy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

I'd like to see Nilai council try to catch stray cats :P

Have fun man
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:00 AM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

San Francisco SPCA Position Statement, January 3, 1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cat Licensing: Analysis of Claims



CLAIM: Cat Licensing will make cat owners more responsible.

Caring can't be mandated, and a licensing mandate will only end up punishing those who care. There are millions of compassionate people who provide abandoned cats with food, love, and shelter in their own homes. Others put aside their own needs in order to care for a beloved pet or make sure a shy and reclusive neighborhood cat has daily sustenance and medical attention. Still others work tirelessly to feed foster and rehabilitate feral cats and kittens, all at their own personal expense. For every one of these caregivers, mandatory cat licensing will exact a heavy toll. These people will either have to pay the license fees - or face citations, fines, penalties, and possible confiscation of the animals they love. These new burdens, inflicted on the very people who are doing the most to help cats in their communities, will force many to stop caring for these animals, or at least force them to care for fewer cats, with the net result being more cats left to fend for themselves and fewer people able to provide them with any kind of safety net at all.

In response to these concerns, some cat licensing proponents have said that enforcement won't be stressed, or will only be "complaint driven." In our view, passing laws that aren't enforced or are enforced sporadically is just as unfair and counterproductive: Few people are likely to comply with a cat licensing mandate that isn't enforced. (In Los Angeles, for instance, compliance rates of less than 1% were reported, in spite of a canvassing program.) And people who "voluntarily" comply can probably be counted among the most responsible (and affluent) pet owners in the community. We see little equity or sense in enacting a law that only ends up penalizing through a licensing tax the very people whose behavior is already exemplary.

Needless to say, truly irresponsible cat owners won't be affected. If the law isn't enforced, they are free to ignore it. If it is enforced against them, they are likely to surrender or abandon their animals, which will only add to the number of cats killed.
CLAIM: Cat Licensing will help raise the status of cats.

In our view this claim is on a par with the suggesting that licensing poor people or the homeless will help raise their "status." Of course, cat licensing proponents aren't making a comparison to people, but to dogs: if cats are licensed like dogs they will apparently enjoy the same "status" as dogs. Unfortunately, dog licensing didn't confer any beneficial "status" on canines: it was and is a tool for protecting livestock, enforcing rabies laws, and ridding the public streets of the perceived threat posed by unowned, free-roaming dogs. Indeed, since 1933 California dog licensing laws have explicitly authorized the impoundment of unlicensed dogs, and millions of dogs have been impounded and killed by animal control agencies throughout the state as a result of these mandatory licensing laws.

This is the precedent to which proponents of cat licensing appeal when they claim that licensing will raise the "status" of cats. We doubt, however, whether cats would choose such a status for themselves. They might well prefer to retain the unlicensed status they now share with humans. And the dogs may want to join them.

CLAIM: Cat licensing will result in more cats being redeemed at shelters.

Unfortunately, the evidence suggests that cat redemptions are just as likely, if not more likely, to decline once voluntary cat identification efforts are replaced with a coercive licensing mandate. In Los Angeles County, for instance, the number of stray cats redeemed by their owners was reported to be down 32% following implementation of mandatory laws.

Proponents have tended to ignore evidence like this, and instead point to the fact that dogs, who have been subject to licensing laws for years, enjoy higher redemption rates than cats. But dogs differ from cats in many ways, and there is no reason to think licensing is the factor that results in the higher redemption rate for dogs. Indeed, San Francisco 63% of the stray dogs at the City's Animal Care and Control Department were redeemed by their owners in the 1993-94 fiscal year. Yet less that 4% of the dogs impounded during that time were licensed. It seems clear, then, that factors other than licensing are responsible for the high redemption rate for dogs.

The most obvious reason for the difference between dog and cat redemption rates is the fact that a much higher proportion of the dogs who are impounded are "owned" in the first place. Few dogs are found, for instance, in the type of feral or doorstep colonies that thousands of cats call home, nor are there many unowned neighborhood dogs. Since most dogs impounded are likely to be "owned" by someone, it makes sense that many more would be redeemed. And since a much smaller proportion of impounded cats are "owned" - a Santa Clara study estimated that less than 9% of all stray cats handled by that county's animal control agency were owned - it makes sense that far fewer cats are redeemed. A licensing program obviously can't change that, unless, of course, it is accomplished by concentrated efforts to round up and kill all unowned cats in a community.

CLAIM: Cat licensing will help reduce the number of stray and abandoned cats.

The only way cat licensing will reduce the number of stray and abandoned cats is if it is enforced by rounding up unlicensed cats and taking them to the local animal control agency where the vast majority will be killed. And this, we fear, is exactly what will happen. Many individuals and groups openly advocate for cat control measures like licensing as a vehicle for round-up-and-kill measures. And even animal control agencies that disclaim any intention of initiating round-up-and-kill programs will have to respond to complaints about cats from these individuals and groups, which will inevitably result in cats being rounded up and killed.

Without round-up-and-kill measures it seems apparent that cat licensing will only work to increase, not decrease, the number of homeless cats. Faced with citations and penalties for not complying cat caretakers who can't afford the new license fees will be forced to surrender their animals to the local shelter or abandon them to fend for themselves. Neighborhood cats, cats in doorstep colonies or multi-cat households, cherished pets owned by seniors on restricted incomes, feral cats with caretakers on limited budgets. These are the kinds of cats who will be most at risk, and for whom a licensing mandate could well be fatal. Of course, for the stray and abandoned cats already in the community, licensing will do nothing.

CLAIM: Cat licensing will help decrease shelter euthanasia.

Since cat licensing will likely result in more cats being surrendered to shelters and abandoned in the community, since it will not appreciably affect redemptions, and since it may very well become a vehicle for round-up-and-kill campaigns, it is difficult for us to see how it would result in a decrease in shelter euthanasia.

CLAIM: Cat licensing will raise money to help fund animal control agencies.

Cat licensing will cost local governments and taxpayers money, not raise it, resulting in a net loss to animal control and/or other vital government services. Indeed, we doubt whether revenues raised would even cover basic administrative expenses. For example, each license fee collected - and most proposals we've seen set the fee between $5 and $10 - will have to cover the costs of manufacturing, handling, storing and mailing the actual licenses (and/or implanting microchips), handling the checks and cash received, issuing receipts, recording and filing the necessary data on each cat and owner, updating the data as needed, responding to public questions and comments, mailing out renewal notices and reminders, preparing accounting statements and annual program reports, etc. This list doesn't include overhead or initial start- up expenses, like hiring and training staff to run the new program and developing ne computer programs and databases.

And if the fees collected won't cover basic administrative expenses, they certainly won't cover the enormous costs of public awareness campaigns and enforcement. As noted above, "voluntary" compliance with cat licensing mandates is notoriously low. To raise compliance rates, the community will have to be made aware of the new mandate: door-to-door canvassing, city and countywide mailings, advertisements in local print media - all bear significant costs. And these campaigns will have to be repeated on a regular basis to maintain public awareness. Of course, these efforts alone won't ensure compliance, and they will have to be backed by meaningful enforcement. New enforcement staff will have to be hired, or existing staff taken away from other essential duties, in order to patrol the community for unlicensed cats, respond to complaints, issue citations, prepare reports,etc. And all these costs will have to be paid by local taxpayers, either through higher taxes or through cuts in other vital government services.

CLAIM: Dog owners contribute to animal control costs through licensing fees; it's time cat owners pay their fair share.

Just as licensing fees aren't likely to cover the real costs of a cat licensing program, we strongly doubt whether the fees now paid by dog owners cover much more than the basic costs of administering dog licensing programs. From a fiscal standpoint, therefore, local governments and taxpayers, not to mention dog owners, may well be better off if mandatory dog licensing were simply abolished. In any event, enacting another costly government program that won't pay for itself isn't the way to give dog owners the equity they seek.

No doubt there will be animal control agencies and contracting humane organizations who dispute our analysis and offer projections to show that cat licensing will make money for animal control services in their communities. we believe these agencies should be willing to stand behind these projections by having their taxpayer- financed budgets cut by the projected amount. Without this or a similar mechanism for accountability, we fear cat licensing will become yet another expensive government program that only works to inappropriately expand government bureaucracies at the expense of local taxpayers, responsible cat caretakers, and the animals themselves.

CLAIM: Regulating cat owners through licensing and other mandates is the only way to solve cat problems.

In our view, the way to teach people to be responsible pet owners and help the cats in a communit community at large through coercive mandates, when it is the local shelters who are the primary source of animals and whose policies and practices have the greatest impact, for better or worse, on local animal welfare issues.

We realize, however that in some cases local shelter policies may have failed and animal problems may be worsening in a community. In such cases, government intervention might be warranted, provided it is carefully focused to have the greatest impact. For instance, requiring shelters to alter animals before adoption and to devote a substantial proportion of their annual animal control and shelter budgets (e.g., 10-20%) to offering free spay/neuter services would do far more to help cats and reduce pet overpopulation than cat licensing and other punitive mandates.*


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: CAT FANCIERS' ALMANAC, Volume 12 Number 2 June 1995 page
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:19 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animais
2500 16th Street • San Francisco, CA 94103-6589 • (415) 554-3000


Position Statement
January 3,1995


Against Mandatory Cat Licensing

Can licensing wipe out homelessness, raise the status of the underprivileged, eliminate the budget crisis, and make people more caring and responsible?

Few would believe these claims, if they were being made about a program to license people.

Yet, when it comes to cats, we are asked to believe all these claims are true.

According to proponents, mandatory cat licensing will put an end to the problem of stray and abandoned cats, raise the status of felines, increase funding for budget-strapped animal control agencies, and make cat owners more responsible.

Unfortunately, licensing cats, like licensing people, won't do any of these things.

The San Francisco SPCA has considered the various claims made for mandatory cat licensing legislation and has found little in the way of evidence — or even, in some cases, common sense—to support them.

In our view, rather than helping cats or their caretakers, the primary effects of mandatory cat licensing legislation would be to:
  1. put the lives and well-being of cats at risk and serve as a tool for round-up-and-kill campaigns;

  2. penalize responsible cat owners and force many compassionate caretakers to stop providing for homeless and abandoned cats;

  3. cost local governments and taxpayers money; and

  4. inappropriately expand the power and reach of government bureaucracies and enforcement agencies.

Indeed, the most vocal proponents of cat licensing have been municipal animal control agencies and humane organizations that hold contracts to perform animal control services—the very agencies and organizations that stand to gain the most in terms of more staff, larger budgets, and expanded enforcement and community oversight powers.

Since none of these broad new powers will help cats, their caretakers, or the local taxpayers (who will ultimately have to foot the bill), we cannot escape the conclusion that the call for cat licensing legislation has more to do with increasing bureaucratic powers, than with compassion, saving lives, and providing a helping hand to those who care.

Our analysis of each of the claims made for mandatory cat licensing is attached.

For further information on The San Francisco SPCA and its programs to help cats and cat caretakers, please contact us at 2500 -16th Street, San Francisco, California 94103-6589, (415) 554-3000.
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies

Last edited by FurKids; 02-04-2009 at 02:39 PM. Reason: edited for increased legibility
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-04-2009, 02:26 PM
mew mew's Avatar
mew mew mew mew is offline
Animal lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Johor
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 16
mew mew is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Licensing cats will make their wallet full of $$$$$, drive more people to dump their cats on the streets, cats lovers will not take or rescue stray cats, in the end the poor cats suffer the most just because of the so called cat license. These council people are not animal lovers.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-04-2009, 02:55 PM
vivienlpl's Avatar
vivienlpl vivienlpl is offline
Vivien Wuz Ere
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Earth - where every human beings have to live together with animals
Posts: 921
Rep Power: 16
vivienlpl is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackie007 View Post
Vivien, Blackie don't need a license collar because he's already a legitimate Malaysian citizen.....dah ada MyKad mah.....we M'sians don't wear license collars kan?
he needs...you need to get one that state - master blackie call 007

then got bell...awww then he will look like a doll
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-04-2009, 03:03 PM
June June is offline
Animal Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tmn Shamelin Perkasa-Kota Kinabalu
Posts: 6,004
Rep Power: 0
June is on a distinguished road
Default Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

True,more people will dump their pet on the street after this people like us (the pet rescuer) yg suffer. we have to take all the shit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mew mew View Post
Licensing cats will make their wallet full of $$$$$, drive more people to dump their cats on the streets, cats lovers will not take or rescue stray cats, in the end the poor cats suffer the most just because of the so called cat license. These council people are not animal lovers.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:07 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by June View Post
True,more people will dump their pet on the street after this people like us (the pet rescuer) yg suffer. we have to take all the shit.
No, not you suffer, you can just dump all the extra cats into the longkang and walk away ... diorang yang akan suffer sebab pet rescuers can no longer give them shelter.

Johor tak ada SPCA ke? SPCA kita senyap aje ke? Untung kucing San Francisco sebab ada SPCA yang gigih memperjuangkan nasib mereka.
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:17 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Besok aku jadi Datuk Bandar aku nak implement "Lesen Bini". Setiap bini kena dapatkan lesen. Bini-bini yang tak ada lesen kat leher, saya punya orang enforcement akan tangkap taroh dalam kandang kat zoo .... huhuhuhuuuuu!!!!!

Pastu aku akan laksanakan "Lesen Anak". Budak mana yang berkeliaran luar umah tak pakai lesen akan orang-orang penguatkuasaan saya tangkap dan heret naik lori bawa ke zoo juga ...
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:21 PM
mew mew's Avatar
mew mew mew mew is offline
Animal lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Johor
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 16
mew mew is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Johor ada SPCA...SPCA Verrry quiet....no sound one.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:26 PM
mew mew's Avatar
mew mew mew mew is offline
Animal lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Johor
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 16
mew mew is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Besok aku jadi Datuk Bandar aku nak implement "Lesen Bini". Setiap bini kena dapatkan lesen. Bini-bini yang tak ada lesen kat leher, saya punya orang enforcement akan tangkap taroh dalam kandang kat zoo .... huhuhuhuuuuu!!!!!

Pastu aku akan laksanakan "Lesen Anak". Budak mana yang berkeliaran luar umah tak pakai lesen akan orang-orang penguatkuasaan saya tangkap dan heret naik lori bawa ke zoo juga ...
Oi....Ini de new Datuk bandar very aggressive....everything want lesen. Finally everything kena lesen....he'll be laughing to the bank. Sleep also laugh.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:46 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Besok aku jadi Datuk Bandar aku nak implement "Lesen Bini". Setiap bini kena dapatkan lesen. Bini-bini yang tak ada lesen kat leher, saya punya orang enforcement akan tangkap taroh dalam kandang kat zoo .... huhuhuhuuuuu!!!!!

Pastu aku akan laksanakan "Lesen Anak". Budak mana yang berkeliaran luar umah tak pakai lesen akan orang-orang penguatkuasaan saya tangkap dan heret naik lori bawa ke zoo juga ...
Tujuan utk wujudkan "Responsible Husbands" and "Responsible Parenting" out of all our men (using the same logic) ... wakakakakakahhhhhhhhh!!!!
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:46 PM
June June is offline
Animal Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tmn Shamelin Perkasa-Kota Kinabalu
Posts: 6,004
Rep Power: 0
June is on a distinguished road
Default Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Wah!! good ideat u Furkid.sapa2 yg nak tambah bini kena fikir beribu kali.klu tak skrg ni bini & anak suma durang chunk je klu dah tak suka.heheheheh!!

buat masa ni kucing yg warganegara rmh ni takde apa2.bayar saja lesen.tp kesianlah kucing2 org yg tak mau bayar lesen.mesti buang kat tepi jln,longkang,pasar mcm piece of kain buruk

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Besok aku jadi Datuk Bandar aku nak implement "Lesen Bini". Setiap bini kena dapatkan lesen. Bini-bini yang tak ada lesen kat leher, saya punya orang enforcement akan tangkap taroh dalam kandang kat zoo .... huhuhuhuuuuu!!!!!

Pastu aku akan laksanakan "Lesen Anak". Budak mana yang berkeliaran luar umah tak pakai lesen akan orang-orang penguatkuasaan saya tangkap dan heret naik lori bawa ke zoo juga ...
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:50 PM
June June is offline
Animal Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tmn Shamelin Perkasa-Kota Kinabalu
Posts: 6,004
Rep Power: 0
June is on a distinguished road
Default Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

I agree 100% lelaki zaman skrg take easy way out.nak kahwin dgn career woman so durang tak payah tanggung bini dan anak.eh,real story one.aku ada kawan mcm tu.klu my hubby buat lagu tu,aku zassss!!! sekali.baru tau.tak payah jadi jantan biar mandul mcm kucing jantan

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Tujuan utk wujudkan "Responsible Husbands" and "Responsible Parenting" out of all our men (using the same logic) ... wakakakakakahhhhhhhhh!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-04-2009, 05:01 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by June View Post
Wah!! good ideat u Furkid.sapa2 yg nak tambah bini kena fikir beribu kali.klu tak skrg ni bini & anak suma durang chunk je klu dah tak suka.heheheheh!!

buat masa ni kucing yg warganegara rmh ni takde apa2.bayar saja lesen.tp kesianlah kucing2 org yg tak mau bayar lesen.mesti buang kat tepi jln,longkang,pasar mcm piece of kain buruk
Nanti wujud kerjaya baru iaitu "Bini Rescuer", tapi jangan rescue janda muda yang lawa dan kaya ajer, ya?

Pastu Andy Tai Koh dan Ezer akan wujudkan forum "Binifinder" lak utk orang-orang cari bini ...
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-05-2009, 09:23 AM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by June View Post
I agree 100% lelaki zaman skrg take easy way out.nak kahwin dgn career woman so durang tak payah tanggung bini dan anak.eh,real story one.aku ada kawan mcm tu.klu my hubby buat lagu tu,aku zassss!!! sekali.baru tau.tak payah jadi jantan biar mandul mcm kucing jantan
Please do not menyeleweng here, June, this is a serious thread (all Hall of Shame threads are serious, many heart rending).

Even though I mention about "Lesen Bini" and "Lesen Anak", and you laugh at it, the point is, (just like cat licensing): what does such actions achieve if at all they achieve something besides filling up the pockets of certain individuals of interest while at the same time emptying taxpayers' pockets?

Does it make the man more responsible towards his wife/wives and children? If yes, how much more and how effective? Sekarang dah ada sijil perkahwinan dan sijil beranak ... are men and women good responsible parents and spouses?
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-05-2009, 09:51 AM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

My pretty Mama sudah dapat lesen ...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	B62CRL06.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	30.9 KB
ID:	3283   Click image for larger version

Name:	CatLicense01.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	13.5 KB
ID:	3284  
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies

Last edited by FurKids; 02-05-2009 at 09:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-05-2009, 10:31 AM
June June is offline
Animal Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tmn Shamelin Perkasa-Kota Kinabalu
Posts: 6,004
Rep Power: 0
June is on a distinguished road
Default Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

it is a serioud thread my friend but I'm not the one who start the bini and man's joke.

What I have to say here,the cat licensing things is created by certain politician to divert our attention on other serious matters so I do not want to make my head explode.In 6 mths time story abt cat licensing will disappear in thin air

Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Please do not menyeleweng here, June, this is a serious thread (all Hall of Shame threads are serious, many heart rending).

Even though I mention about "Lesen Bini" and "Lesen Anak", and you laugh at it, the point is, (just like cat licensing): what does such actions achieve if at all they achieve something besides filling up the pockets of certain individuals of interest while at the same time emptying taxpayers' pockets?

Does it make the man more responsible towards his wife/wives and children? If yes, how much more and how effective? Sekarang dah ada sijil perkahwinan dan sijil beranak ... are men and women good responsible parents and spouses?

Last edited by June; 02-05-2009 at 10:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-05-2009, 12:01 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

Quote:
Originally Posted by June View Post
it is a serioud thread my friend but I'm not the one who start the bini and man's joke.

What I have to say here,the cat licensing things is created by certain politician to divert our attention on other serious matters so I do not want to make my head explode.In 6 mths time story abt cat licensing will disappear in thin air
Bukan joke nie, June, I was giving example to illustrate the San Francisco SPCA's very true statement in
Post #23 that says " Few would believe these claims, if they were being made about a program to license people. Yet, when it comes to cats, we are asked to believe all these claims are true ... " emphasising the incredulousness of the rationale behind the move to license cats.

No brain, kan?
__________________
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-05-2009, 01:07 PM
June June is offline
Animal Lover
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tmn Shamelin Perkasa-Kota Kinabalu
Posts: 6,004
Rep Power: 0
June is on a distinguished road
Default Now, Nilai council may impose licensing for cats

huhuhuhu!!! tgk berapa lama durang blh bertahan with the cat license issue org politik ni pandai cakap je tp tak tau kerja.suma sibuk nak kayakan poket masing2


Quote:
Originally Posted by FurKids View Post
Bukan joke nie, June, I was giving example to illustrate the San Francisco SPCA's very true statement in
Post #23 that says " Few would believe these claims, if they were being made about a program to license people. Yet, when it comes to cats, we are asked to believe all these claims are true ... " emphasising the incredulousness of the rationale behind the move to license cats.

No brain, kan?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Why dog only"? Dog owners in Nilai must now get neighbour’s permission, dog is my buddy Hall of Shame 22 01-22-2009 03:18 PM
Dog owners in Nilai must now get neighbour's permission mew mew Doggy TV & Photos 15 01-21-2009 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 

Main Site
Home
Advertising
Sponsored Listings
Sign Up
Find A Pet
Share & Save Lives
About PetFinder.my
Terms & Conditions
Freebies / Starter Pack
Report Animal Abuse
Contact Us
Facilities
WAGazine
Discussion Forum
Medical Fund
Pet Food, Toys & Products
Cuteness Meter
Central News Portal
Visual Map
Knowledge Library
Microchip Directory
FurryCards
Mobile
iPhone & iPod App
Android App

Social Media
Facebook
Twitter
KindMeal
Meat-Free Dining
Meal Deals
Kind Moments
Delicious Menu

Others
World Animal Day Contest
Digi iPhone Contest
East Coast Flood Relief
It's Pawssible
Freebies
Online Store
Discussions
Blacklists & Scams



Copyright © PetFinder.my. All rights reserved.