Go Back   PetFinder.my > Reviews, Notices & Stories > Success Stories

Success Stories Share your happy and heart-warming "tails" with our community. Let us know about your successful rescue, rehome or adoption efforts!

Thread Tools
Old 09-24-2009, 12:00 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Good boy, Murphy ....

Sniffing Out Cancer
By Narda G. Robinson, DO, DVM, MS, FAAMA

Going in to a doctor’s office to have a suspicious lump checked? Imagine your surprise at finding at your doctor’s side an assistant wagging a tail and sniffing you vigorously. Is this more pleasant than just about any other diagnostic screening? Yes. As reliable? Possibly.

While some may shudder at the thought of being analyzed for cancer by a wet nose, the brain attached to that nose does an amazing job of sorting “normal” from “abnormal.”

In addition to cancer, sniffer dogs can signal hyper- and hypoglycemia and possibly seizure activity. As written by the authors who first talked about canine cancer sniffers, “The adjunctive use of animals with highly developed sensory modalities in cancer diagnosis is worth considering—and is infinitely better than using dogs to study tobacco carcinogenesis.”

It all began in 1989, when dermatologists broke their story in The Lancet about a 44-year-old woman whose border collie/ Doberman mix incessantly sniffed, and one time tried to bite off, a thigh mole confirmed histologically as malignant melanoma.1

They explained, “This dog may have saved her owner’s life by prompting her to seek treatment when the lesion was still at a thin and curable stage.”

What unfolded from there has created a mystery that leaves researchers scratching their heads. The canine tumor tattling that started with skin lesions (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma) extended to breast and lung cancer and even urinary tract neoplasia.

The dogs don’t need to see the lesions; they can find the problematic moles under clothing.2

The tissue doesn’t need to be living; one of the first accounts of in-vitro tumor sniffing took place in Florida, where a dermatologist teamed up with a former police- and military-dog trainer who taught a Schnauzer named George how to recognize in-vitro malignant melanoma tissue based on conventional sniffer-dog techniques.3
__________________________________________________ ___________
For cancer, better screening leads to longer lives, as does tighter glucose control for diabetics.
__________________________________________________ ___________
Once, George examined a patient harboring several supposedly cancer-free moles and became “crazy” after sniffing one of them. Subsequent analysis confirmed the lesion as an early malignancy.

Once word spread about this “pet scan” cancer screening, reports surfaced about dogs smelling out other types of cancer. One physician wrote, “I had encountered a patient who claimed that her dog’s incessant sniffing led to her finding a breast mass that proved malignant.

Owing to the lack of substantiating literature to back up her claim, most of her medical team brushed this off as coincidence, particularly since the lesion was internal rather than cutaneous as in other anecdotal reports.”4

These anecdotes led to controlled trials. In 2004, investigators performed a proof of principle examination of whether dogs could identify which patients had bladder cancer by smelling their urine samples. Dogs outperformed chance by a nearly three times higher correct response rate, deemed highly significant.5

One commentator wrote about how dogs in training consistently pointed to a control patient’s urine as cancer-positive, even though the patient’s cystoscopy and ultrasound did not indicate cancer. The dogs’ focus on the sample caused the investigator to look again, this time finding a kidney carcinoma.6

More studies followed. This included recruiting dogs to sniff out cancer from the exhaled breath of patients who had lung and breast carcinoma.7

Their ability to identify lung cancer had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.99.

They caught breast cancer with a sensitivity of 0.88 and 0.98 specificity.

The stage of disease was relatively unimportant. Training took place over a matter of weeks and involved “ordinary household dogs with only basic behavioral ‘puppy training.’ ”

Most recently, a double-blind test series showed that dogs successfully discriminated between different histopathological types and grades of ovarian carcinomas and normal tissue.

Sensitivity and specificity rates were 100 percent and 97.5 percent, respectively.8

It mattered not whether the tissue was early stage, low grade or advanced. Fat from the same individuals who contributed the carcinoma did not test positive.

How do they do it? No one knows for sure.

Volatile organic compounds in the exhaled air may explain some of the findings,9 but not the zeroing in on the body surface overlying a breast lesion or of sniffing out a melanoma through trouser legs.

Dogs’ remarkable talents do not stop there. They appear able to detect precipitous declines in blood glucose, allowing rapid intervention before a loss of consciousness ensues.10

A forensic scientist who trained dogs for law enforcement became one of the first to identify dogs as hypoglycemia sniffers. His dog was alerted when he experienced an episode of severe hypoglycemia.

The scientist then tested the dog using a sweater that a diabetic had been wearing during a hypoglycemic episode, and it sniffed positive.

Dogs can likewise alert to hyperglycemia, allowing those fortunate enough to live with a trained dog to maintain a much tighter control over their blood sugar levels, no longer needing to fear going too low. 11

How do these dog hypoglycemia detectives announce their findings? By causing a raging ruckus—jumping, running in the house, hiding under chairs, pacing, pawing at the person or putting their head in the person’s lap until the hypoglycemic individual ingests sufficient carbohydrates to normalize their blood glucose.12

It’s hard to miss or ignore their agitation.

Is there something that the dog’s brain, from olfactory receptor to central nervous system to behavioral display, can assemble that will be quicker, less expensive and more accurate than laboratory analyses?

For cancer, better screening leads to longer lives, as does tighter glucose control for diabetics. Might some of the health-care dollars of the future be rightly dedicated to train and develop canine cancer catchers and bad-blood sugar barkers?

As the editor of one journal reporting on these stories pondered: “So what if the canine nose is more accomplished at detecting cancer or predicting seizures or hypoglycemia than our most refined instruments? …

How much proof must we acquire before employing such non-toxic diagnostic methods in pursuit of covert cancer cells, or to portend a hypoglycemic event or convulsions?”13

Narda Robinson, DVM, DO, Dipl. ABMA, FAAMA, oversees complementary veterinary education at Colorado State University.

This column first appeared in the Septemer 2009 issue of Veterinary Practice News


1. Williams H and Pembroke A. Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic? The Lancet. 1989;1:734.

2. Church J and Williams H. Another sniffer dog for the clinic? The Lancet. 2001;358:930.

3. Church J and Williams H. Another sniffer dog for the clinic? The Lancet. 2001;358:930.

4. Welsh JS. Another cancer detected by “pet scan”. BMJ. 2004;329:1286.

5. Willis CM, Church SM, Guest CM, et al. Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. BMJ. 2004;329:712-714. Cited in Cole TJ. Commentary: teaching dogs new tricks. BMJ. 2004;329:715.

6. Cole TJ. Commentary: teaching dogs new tricks. BMJ. 2004;329:715.

7. McCulloch M, Jezlerski T, Broffman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2006;5(1):30-39.

8. Horvath G, Jarverud GAK, Jarverud S, et al. Human ovarian carcinomas detected by specific odor. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2008;7(2):76-80.

9. Ligor M, Ligor T, Bajtarevic A, et al. Determination of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer using solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(5):550-560.

10. Wells DL, Lawson SQ, and Siriwardena AN. Canine responses to hypoglycemia in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2008;14(10):1235-1241.

11. Spake A. Could a dog save (Your Life?} Diabetes Forecast. 2008; 61(3):40-47.

12. Spake A. Could a dog save (Your Life?} Diabetes Forecast. 2008; 61(3):40-47.

13. Benda W. Nature’s child [Editorial]. J Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2008;14(10):1177.
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies

Last edited by FurKids; 09-24-2009 at 12:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2009, 12:39 PM
FurKids's Avatar
FurKids FurKids is offline
Pets Are NOT Disposable
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,041
Rep Power: 18
FurKids is on a distinguished road
Unhappy Vets are human too ....

From http://www.veterinarypracticenews.co...st-say-no.aspx

Convenience Euthanasia? Just Say No
By Alice Villalobos, DVM

His face was flushed and his ears were red. He was leading two big, beautiful German shepherd dogs toward the back of the clinic.

I knew something was wrong. He was upset, exasperated, frustrated. He said that the owners of these dogs were going on a long vacation and they wanted the dogs put down.

It was 1972, my first job, my boss. What could I say? What should I say? Something like this came from my heart: “You shouldn't do this if you don't want to. They can take their dogs to the pound where they might have a chance to be adopted. A pet hospital is not the place for healthy pets to be conveniently killed. If it is against your personal ethics, tell them to take their dogs elsewhere.”

But he looked at me wistfully. Then he dutifully shrugged his shoulders and continued walking to the back, closer to the freezer. Death was in the air that day.
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Since foreclosure fever has added to the meltdown of the U.S. economy, more animals are being dumped in the nation’s shelters and veterinary hospitals.
__________________________________________________ ______________________

I will never forget that moment and the look in his eyes. His spirit was broken. We were generations apart. He was from the old school, more utilitarian.

I was from the new school, human-animal bond oriented. The entire hospital knew that this was a travesty against “The Bond,” forever to be broken that day.

The impact on our staff made that day linger on like a long funeral.

Later in the day, I proposed that we, as a veterinary hospital, unanimously agree to defer convenience euthanasia.

Our options would be to: educate clients, offer assistance, rehome the pets with another family or refer to the ASPCA or a local rescue organization. I helped my boss redefine his purpose and the services that his veterinary hospital would be proud to perform.

It was a blessing for my goodhearted boss to recognize that it is OK for veterinarians to delegate convenience euthanasia to the shelters, because that is what shelters do. Taxpayers pay shelters to perform the grim role of killing society’s disposable pet population. That is a role the private veterinary clinic must eschew to stay sane.

In the old days, pet owners might have had some justification to avoid the pound. Conditions were deplorable and death by gas chamber was scorned as cruel.

They might have felt justified in having their pet euthanized by their kind veterinarian as the best and most loving option for a pet that they were leaving behind.

Those scary days are vanishing with the refreshening of many area shelters, adoption programs and the “no kill” philosophy that is sweeping the nation.
Since the horrible foreclosure fever has added to the meltdown of the U.S. economy, more animals are being dumped in the nation’s shelters and veterinary hospitals. Those who are judgmental may label these animals as abandoned for convenience euthanasia.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to move into rental units with animals, especially in areas that enforce breed bans. Many people have been forced into prioritizing the survival of their families vs. the family pet.
What price do we pay for convenience euthanasia?

The highest rate of suicide in our profession in America involves workers who euthanize dogs and cats in animal shelters and pounds on a daily basis.

Researchers from the University of Southampton School of Medicine in Hampshire, England, report that the rate of suicide in veterinarians in the UK is four times that of the general public and twice that of doctors and dentists.

Richard Mellanby, David Bartram and David Baldwin published this sad information in the October 2005 issue of the UK’s journal Veterinary Record.

They listed several factors that influence suicide in their veterinary surgeons, such as access to lethal drugs, euthanasia being an encouraged and justified procedure, job dissatisfaction, job stress and predisposition to depression.

A website now pools support mechanisms so they can be accessed in one place by veterinary surgeons, nurses and students.

I personally feel that this study failed to mention the emotional impact that bovine encephalopathy—or mad cow--disease had on veterinarians and co-workers in the UK. They were asked to supervise mass killings of millions of animals. Being involved with that misery must have taken its toll in job dissatisfaction and depression.

Is convenience euthanasia on the rise? Society is deluged with the mentality of obsolescence for cars, computers, electronic gadgets, throwaway plastic and Styrofoam containers. Let’s hope that the human-animal bond, which nurtures attachment and loving relationships, will offset the deafening drums to cast animals away when things get rough.

Some practitioners are refusing to put down animals that aren't ill, dying or in intractable pain. The pet may have become a lifestyle burden to the family due to behavior problems and old age issues such as incontinence, arthritis, blindness or degenerative myelopathy.

Often we are actually staring at economic euthanasia, especially for pets that do not have health insurance. Many families are in economic crisis and it is hard to distinguish whether they want their pet euthanatized for convenience or for economic purposes.

A good veterinarian-client relationship is essential to resolve this situation with the pet’s best interests in mind.

Referral to a behaviorist might help the cat with inappropriate urination or help the dog that chews and digs. Families with feeble animals may benefit with quality of life counselling using the Quality of Life Scale.

Contracting for doggie day care or routine veterinary home care services may also ease the burden. Old dog and old cat rescue and pet hospice organizations are emerging as “rest homes” for pets. Their purpose is to accept failing animals and rehabilitate them or place them into end-of-life care programs. Some pet owners donate considerable money when placing their pet(s) in these “pet rest homes.”

Veterinarians are innately burdened with the pull and push dilemma of being both the healers and the executioners for their sick and geriatric patients.

We routinely juggle and struggle, asking ourselves, “Do we serve the animal, our client or the human-animal bond?” Every encounter with this ethical dilemma oscillates with intensity.

These issues are inherent in our profession and can cause compassion fatigue and burnout. Precautions to prevent maladaptive behavior in our profession should be taught in veterinary schools. There should be no dispute regarding convenience euthanasia.

The sincere answer is a straightforward, “No,” followed by, “Please allow us to give you some viable options that may work out for you and your pets.”
"We organized in the past to make Trap-Neuter-Return possible. Today, we organize to make Trap-Neuter-Return the norm and to end the unnecessary killing of cats in animal shelters across the country and provide humane care." - Alley Cat Allies
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh, humans are so cruel. ilaina93 Hall of Shame 7 09-18-2009 03:10 AM
Dogs (not chimps) most like humans lynielime Dogs & Puppies 32 06-27-2009 07:52 PM
.:: Inconsiderate HUmans! ::. BabyZee Hall of Shame 3 07-29-2008 04:43 PM

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Main Site
Sponsored Listings
Sign Up
Find A Pet
Share & Save Lives
About PetFinder.my
Terms & Conditions
Freebies / Starter Pack
Report Animal Abuse
Contact Us
Discussion Forum
Medical Fund
Pet Food, Toys & Products
Cuteness Meter
Central News Portal
Visual Map
Knowledge Library
Microchip Directory
iPhone & iPod App
Android App

Social Media
Meat-Free Dining
Meal Deals
Kind Moments
Delicious Menu

World Animal Day Contest
Digi iPhone Contest
East Coast Flood Relief
It's Pawssible
Online Store
Blacklists & Scams

Copyright © PetFinder.my. All rights reserved.